Monday 29th January 2007
by christo
Madiba said that human rights would be the guiding light of South Africa’s foreign policy. So what the hell, Mr. Mbeki, is your government doing giving a cheesy thumbs-up to Myanmar, Iran, Libya, Haiti and Zimbabwe?
As the leader of South Africa’s official opposition, Tony Leon, puts it – there is human rights discourse, but no actual action to support that discourse:
It is consistent with a larger pattern, in which South Africa through its deeds if not words eschews human rights issues and shores up undemocratic regimes worldwide.
Our foreign policy, if we separate actual resolutions from occasional professions in favour of democracy and human rights, appears to be a fitful but sustained apologia for some of the world’s most odious authoritarian regimes.
Expats and Afrikaners love this stuff in a lovingly loathful way – it convinces them, in one way of expressing it, that the rulers of the New South Africa are just as gross and morally corrupt (if not more) than the governments of the Old South Africa. It will be interesting to see how the new generations born of the apartheid supporters and benefactors will inherit the legacy of Nelson Mandela as they increasingly fight the ANC on issues such as human rights violations at home and globally.
I just recently received an article published by a small South African newspaper. It reports that the official policy for all new judicial appointments to the Supreme Court specifies a skin colour requirement.
Except for this. You need a little tweeking here.
“your government doing giving a cheesy casino advertising style”
I liked this entry, alot. It showcases a good writing style. I wasn’t really paying attention to the content. But I imagine it was as lovely and huggable as your syntax.
I think it is great that you’re getting this experience of actually working with people who need to convince you that their government is committed to human rights. I’d love to see how he jumped that hoop.
Concerning the Supreme Court policy, I’d like to read some commentary on that. I feel like I’m out of the discussion on that subject and would hate to think that it is just about reverse discrimination – although I don’t know what else it could be.
this is really interesting commentary. did you get my email? in my meeting with the SA ambassador, i was really impressed with his apparent commitment to human rights. he even had me convinced that SA’s vote against the resolution condemning myanmar was a good thing. when i left, i realized he was a really smooth talker!
I’m curious about this Supreme Court rule, what do you think?