<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pick an enemy, make community.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:14:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Veronica</title>
		<link>http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6094</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/#comment-6094</guid>
		<description>true. but I rememeber Hans Boersma defining violence as more than that of a reaction to a threat or enemy or inflicting some sort of harm. Violence can be of other emotions or actions and not simply a reaction AGAINST something can&#039;t it? The violence of love perhaps? Just trying to get my head around why I don&#039;t see an enemy as necessary. But perhaps we are aiming at the same thing because even when there is a violence of say, love, there is also a forcible attempt at keeping out say, isolation or alienation. But it is more a forcible attempt to gain or keep something. And perhaps that in itself can cement a community. Something to strive for, not necessarily against. But if you&#039;re for something are you automatically against something else? Perhaps.
Ramblings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true. but I rememeber Hans Boersma defining violence as more than that of a reaction to a threat or enemy or inflicting some sort of harm. Violence can be of other emotions or actions and not simply a reaction AGAINST something can&#8217;t it? The violence of love perhaps? Just trying to get my head around why I don&#8217;t see an enemy as necessary. But perhaps we are aiming at the same thing because even when there is a violence of say, love, there is also a forcible attempt at keeping out say, isolation or alienation. But it is more a forcible attempt to gain or keep something. And perhaps that in itself can cement a community. Something to strive for, not necessarily against. But if you&#8217;re for something are you automatically against something else? Perhaps.<br />
Ramblings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christo</title>
		<link>http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/comment-page-1/#comment-6083</link>
		<dc:creator>Christo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/#comment-6083</guid>
		<description>On whether an enemy is optional in forging a union of people, two european ladies have suggested quite strongly to me of the primacy of violence in human behaviour - rather they put it more like this: The history of violence is a necessary history. Violence, they argue, is not something contingent on the will of some class of people over the rest, rather it comes &quot;from below.&quot; Since I think I&#039;m somewhat honest with myself - I dare say I may indeed have it in me (worse than I&#039;m sure I can imagine) to &quot;act&quot; in &quot;community&quot; with others and that meat is needed upon which to celebrate our sense of each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On whether an enemy is optional in forging a union of people, two european ladies have suggested quite strongly to me of the primacy of violence in human behaviour &#8211; rather they put it more like this: The history of violence is a necessary history. Violence, they argue, is not something contingent on the will of some class of people over the rest, rather it comes &#8220;from below.&#8221; Since I think I&#8217;m somewhat honest with myself &#8211; I dare say I may indeed have it in me (worse than I&#8217;m sure I can imagine) to &#8220;act&#8221; in &#8220;community&#8221; with others and that meat is needed upon which to celebrate our sense of each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Bisschop</title>
		<link>http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/comment-page-1/#comment-5917</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay Bisschop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/#comment-5917</guid>
		<description>I read this post. I wish I could say I had something profound to add. I do not. Veronica makes a good point about the danger of focusing community on a common enemy. There has to come a point where community exists for the purpose of bringing people together because they were made to live together. 

I agree with Christo in that environmental fanatics can be help us to confront our apathy. I am not sure whether the knowledge of a &quot;shared danger&quot; is always necessary. However, that said, it is essential to have the awareness and commitment to action in order to create real community. I am not a fan of the question which &quot;is the most pressing danger?&quot; In certain cases, one threat is greater than another. It is important to have a willingness and desire to see dangers  and act to correct or avoid issues.

This doesn&#039;t add too much to the dialogue. But I thought i should make my presence known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this post. I wish I could say I had something profound to add. I do not. Veronica makes a good point about the danger of focusing community on a common enemy. There has to come a point where community exists for the purpose of bringing people together because they were made to live together. </p>
<p>I agree with Christo in that environmental fanatics can be help us to confront our apathy. I am not sure whether the knowledge of a &#8220;shared danger&#8221; is always necessary. However, that said, it is essential to have the awareness and commitment to action in order to create real community. I am not a fan of the question which &#8220;is the most pressing danger?&#8221; In certain cases, one threat is greater than another. It is important to have a willingness and desire to see dangers  and act to correct or avoid issues.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t add too much to the dialogue. But I thought i should make my presence known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Vandergugten</title>
		<link>http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/comment-page-1/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Vandergugten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>In the depths of anxiety and semi-depression, dialogue with the enemy is Promethean prayer. That is, wrestling the fire/life/existence from God. Tragic, because one debases oneself, defaces the Imago Dei, by stealing a gift out of its givers hands.

The options of a failure: Go into a trade and start a band. Come to the realization that he is the two things he hated most, a flaming existentialist and a phoney. Quietly wander the sidewalks / sing on the bus. Smoke cigarettes and scribble poetry. Live vicariously through his children. And... advance the Kingdom of God somehow: find an enemy to kill him for defending the word of God. Easy enough; obey the One with ferocious zeal. But if he had done that in the first place, he might just have been responsible enough not to fail... &quot;husha! husha! we all fall down.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the depths of anxiety and semi-depression, dialogue with the enemy is Promethean prayer. That is, wrestling the fire/life/existence from God. Tragic, because one debases oneself, defaces the Imago Dei, by stealing a gift out of its givers hands.</p>
<p>The options of a failure: Go into a trade and start a band. Come to the realization that he is the two things he hated most, a flaming existentialist and a phoney. Quietly wander the sidewalks / sing on the bus. Smoke cigarettes and scribble poetry. Live vicariously through his children. And&#8230; advance the Kingdom of God somehow: find an enemy to kill him for defending the word of God. Easy enough; obey the One with ferocious zeal. But if he had done that in the first place, he might just have been responsible enough not to fail&#8230; &#8220;husha! husha! we all fall down.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Martin Moes</title>
		<link>http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/comment-page-1/#comment-5871</link>
		<dc:creator>James Martin Moes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christodeklerk.com/2007/03/20/pick-an-enemy-make-community/#comment-5871</guid>
		<description>The greatest enemy is irresponsibility.

And, if I was faced with The War, I wouldn&#039;t go. And if I was confronted by him, I would sing Him a lament, and then later, a song.

When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, &quot;How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?&quot; Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and brothers who were to be killed as they had been was completed. (Revelation 6:9-11)

(I didn&#039;t read everybody&#039;s comments: I apologize: typically, I like eavesdropping)


Responsibility to the call, for He who has ears to hear, let him hear.

- Don&#039;t ask me to tell you.
- Why not?
- 
-
-
-
-
- Oh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest enemy is irresponsibility.</p>
<p>And, if I was faced with The War, I wouldn&#8217;t go. And if I was confronted by him, I would sing Him a lament, and then later, a song.</p>
<p>When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, &#8220;How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?&#8221; Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and brothers who were to be killed as they had been was completed. (Revelation 6:9-11)</p>
<p>(I didn&#8217;t read everybody&#8217;s comments: I apologize: typically, I like eavesdropping)</p>
<p>Responsibility to the call, for He who has ears to hear, let him hear.</p>
<p>- Don&#8217;t ask me to tell you.<br />
- Why not?<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
- Oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
